(Does it mean that it only falls on "half-decent") Status? So, is it the 650 with 2GB or the 650 Ti with 1GB? For video editing, the specific software you are using and the size/complexity of the video itself is going to affect whether the K2000M is worth it. The GPU is used for onscreen rendering and export, priority areas for video production. Great post by the way. If you would like to run this set of actions on your own computer, you can download them here: Download Link. I just pulled a quick reliability report from our sales and since Jan 2014 GeForce cards have a 2.5% failure rate, Radeon cards have a 18.8% failure rate. So the question of GeForce vs. Quadro is really about whether or not the program is designed to need double precision from the GPU or not. Incredibly instructive. If you do very heavy editing, you might want to go with the 2GB card to be on the safe side. Kudos for keeping your articles about CS6 online and available.Some of us are quite happy with owning our CS6EE outright, and not needing CC features, nor being held for monthly ransom. Really, when you get down to the actual GPU core, GeForce and Quadro cards are really not all that different. Quadro is really only necessary if you use a 10-bit display since GeForce doesn't support that. Or the lack of ram still affect the total size of the frame but the doubling of CUDA cores allow for a more complex sequence? If they are, this means that consumers who want an NVIDIA-based video card will not be limited to either a Quadro card or a card that is from the previous generation (NVIDIA 500 series). This formula is (width x height)/16,384 megabytes. In addition, they tend to run hotter and have more driver issues than NVIDIA cards. Ha I feel silly asking about Lenovo in a different company's forum sorry. These Quadro cards are Fermi-based. Sorry, took you a bit further off the topic at hand :). Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. Do any photo editing programs utilize CUDA? Introduction . You definitely want to be editing from a computer that has an SSD. Unless you're a photographer or the like, I would stick with a standard screen. Sometimes these types of graphs can be hard to translate into real-world situations. So I started working on a CS:GO montage but when I put the zoom transmission and turbulent displacement on my clips it said GPU Acceleration required. In the case of Premiere, it is really more about driver support than anything else. To use them will require that you manually edit your Premiere Pro CS6 configuration file.  At least with CS5, the Mercury Playback Engine in Premiere Pro was dependent on NVIDIA's CUDA technology, so unless that has changed dramatically then I think we will only see improvements on NVIDIA graphics cards. Are you sure you are using the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000? It depends on how much video RAM you need. I liked those ThinkPad style sticks too! Adobe has added some OpenCL support on Mac OS recently, so it is something that will likely happen at some point on Windows as well. Since the disk test will not utilize the GPU very much, we will only be reporting on the MPEG2-DVD, H.264 and MPE results. whenever i export or render video it export damage video. If you do need more than 1GB of video RAM, then the 650 2GB card will be faster than the 650 Ti 1GB. To help give a sense of scale as to how much better using GPU acceleration is compared to using the CPUs only for rendering, we also included results with the MPE running in software mode (no GPU acceleration). :), That link appears to be recommendations for NLE - Non Linear Editing, a form of video editing. A used GTX 580 or a new GTX 650ti ... both are now within the same price range. After making the edit for the cards that needed it, we ensured that MPE GPU acceleration was enabled then followed the benchmarking instructions for the PPMB6 benchmark. Those versions only had CUDA support, which is exclusively a NVIDIA technology. It also lists the graphics cards that support GPU acceleration in Adobe Premiere Pro. So, contrary to the compatibility list, there is no reason to use an older generation NVIDIA GTX 580 since the current generation NVIDIA cards performs as well or better. So unless you never need to be able to get your work done faster, you likely will need to move to the subscription model (or some other software package entirely) at some point.  Hopefully that helps :),  Thnx a lot for your kindness! For Photoshop CS6, the GPU accelleration is done via OpenCL - which means that any modern video card (NVIDIA, AMD, or Intel) will work... just to varying degrees. But after upgrading to CC2018 I can never use GPU acceleration. Also, from the choice of Geforce cards, Adobe has typically recommended/certified only those that end in -70 or -80 - the most expensive cards (not counting mobile GPUs). i have installed a quadro 4000 recently, and see no improvement in premiere pro cs6 performance. However, the GeForce GTX 660 should do well - it did great in our tests above, if you want to check them out. If you decide that a GeForce card is suitable for your needs, the GeForce GTX 650 does a very reasonable job and is almost able to match the other GTX cards. My 9800GT 512mb just fried and I'm in the process of finding a replacement that is also able to use the MPE. Previewing With Photoshop CS6, Adobe began integrating the Mercury Graphics Engine which uses the video card (via OpenCL and OpenGL) to vastly improve the performance of certain features. Full instructions for doing so can be found here. We used pretty high-end hardware in our test systems, so even if it was the CPU or RAM that is the limiting factor, there isn't much you can do about that with today's technology. If not, though, the work-around used in CS5 and CS6 is pretty easy. Adobe's MPE hardware acceleration uses the discrete GPU only as needed during certain operations (effects, scaling/resizing, frame rate changes). We've always felt that there simply is no reason to alienate people who don't own our products. Totaling the time it took to complete the three sections of the benchmark gives us results that are strikingly similar to our Adobe Photoshop CS6 GPU Acceleration results.  From Adobe that would be for Premiere Pro and possibly After Effects, not Photoshop. What sort of drive are the files you are working with on? Now that you are looking at C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Premiere CS5 in command prompt, type GPUSniffer.exe and press ENTER. If you don't think you'll be doing that much editing, then it would probably be fine - or if you plan to upgrade in only a couple of years anyway. Would be interesting to see some bench results for After Effects CS6 if possible. In this video, I show you how to enable your Graphics Card for GPU Acceleration in Adobe Premiere CS6 CC 2017. There are also work-arounds for Premiere Pro CS5 and CS6 to allow some video cards that aren't officially supported to work anyway. Yes I wish companies like yours could offer pointing sticks on their keyboards because once you learn to use one they are great because your fingers never have to leave the keyboard. While we did not see any problems in our testing with these 'incompatible' cards, technically these are unsupported configurations and our expectation is that Adobe Support would treat them as such if you ever needed their help. after reading your article i'm almost ready to upgrade my nvidia 9800gt (512 mb vram) to a gtx 650 with 2 gb vram. Want to see photoshop scream? Not at the moment, although we are getting ready to do this with the newer Quadro and FirePro cards. This is a great way to easily improve performance, but it adds more complexity to the question of "what hardware do I need" since the video card is now a bigger part of the performance equation. Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. We didn't do any testing with laptops, but I would suspect that this "wall" will happen even sooner with mobile CPUs since they are less powerful than their desktop counterparts. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. From our testing, we can now confidently state that even though the NVIDIA 600-series and Intel HD 4000 graphics are not on Adobe's compatibility list, GPU acceleration in Photoshop CS6 works great on those cards. The odd point in our benchmarks is the AMD Radeon HD 7970. I hope it helps. Have a great day :). I don't think the K20 or K20x cards help Photoshop at all - at least, not the base software. 95% NTSC on our 15 inch, 90% NTSC on our 17 inch. We have no idea why this is, but to be sure we did not have erroneous results we actually ended up running many of our benchmarks dozens of times just to be 100% sure of our results. If you have a bit more to spend, but cannot afford a NVIDIA GTX 680 2GB (which was the top performer), we recommend the NVIDIA Geforce GTX 660 2GB as it's performance was almost identical to the NVIDIA Geforce GTX 660 Ti and GTX 670, yet is much cheaper. Thanks for that, Matt. That's okay, but I hate to lose out on new features. As far as I know, the whole artifacting or poor results thing is completely a myth. All programs I'm running in a VM tell me that no GPU acceleration is available at all. I'm wanting to update my graphics card to one supported in adobe's GPU accelerated list. This is coming pretty late but maybe it can also help folks who find this article. Warning: Many of the cards we test below are not on Adobe's official list of compatible cards. So for 1080p a 6700K is pretty good (but not best), but for 4K+ it will start to lag behind other CPU options. Adobe should be more specific, but i Think that if gtx 760 is supported in After effects CC for gpu acceleration, I may use it with no problem in Premiere Pro.... do you think it will work fine? Would really appreciate a small update of this with HD4600 and Iris please. You might also want to look at your drive setup. One thing to note is that even if Premiere is not able to use the GPU for MPE acceleration, it can always utilize software-level support. how izit with a 650 is a equal with 680?Â, The 680 is still faster, but by a very narrow margin. Scroll down a bit and you will see the instructions for "unlocking" the card for use with Premiere Pro CS6. (Adobe says that can't test every single Gpu). Sure, no reason to pull them down - although we do put up warnings about them being pretty dated. When I published the Creative Suite 6 announcement and mentioned that, I got an email from Edelman—the PR company that represents Adobe—touting the MPE and MGE (Mercury Graphics Engine, the GPU acceleration component of the other CS apps besides Premiere) and its support for AMD products. If you have to edit the file though, it is technically unsupported by Adobe so don't expect to get any support from them if something goes wrong. The wide gamut screens provide a richer color spectrum -- most useful for photographers who calibrate their screens and want to be able to see the best visual representation of their work. Does the doubling of CUDA cores offset the lack of 1GB of RAM? Thank you for the reply I appreciate it. Note that many of these effects require that GPU acceleration is enabled, so even if you have a card that does not fully support OpenCL, this box must be checked in order for all of the effects to function properly.  The rest of the models in that series won't be out until early 2013. ohh man no comparision to CPUs, sorry but really wasted time. Is the Quadro K2000M worth the additional cost? Check out our follow-up article: Adobe Premiere Pro CC Professional GPU Acceleration. If you would like to see the individual benchmark times for each effect, feel free to click on any of the thumbnails below for a closer look. It added OpenGL acceleration, which works on AMD cards. The GT 610 was at the bottom of our results by a pretty large margin, so we can say for sure that using a GTX 650/Quadro 2000 or above is certainly worth the monetary cost. Unlikely, since one is for ray-traced 3D rendering and the other is for general video rendering. Graphics card with at least 4GB of memory (VRAM). My guess, whatever your video card is, is that it may not be set up to be used by Premiere correctly. Adobe Premiere Pro und Adobe Media Encoder können die verfügbaren GPUs auf Ihrem System nutzen, um die Verarbeitungslast zwischen der CPU und der GPU zu verteilen und eine bessere Leistung zu erzielen.Derzeit wird der größte Teil der Verarbeitung von CPU und GPU ausgeführt, die bei der Verarbeitung bestimmter Aufgaben und Funktionen behilflich sind. In terms of performance, SSDs are fast enough that I think having the scratch disk on there with the OS / applications would be okay. Adobe doesn't do a good job of keeping their GPU lists updated - and none of the cards currently shown on their list are in that price range. Hello, I have two AMD Radeon HD 7870, according to the Adove list my GPUs are compatible with Premiere Pro CS6 acelleration settings, but I can't get it to work, any help please!!! just got one question: my mobo is an intel dp45sg, with pci-e 2.0, and the gtx 650 is pci-e 3.0... will i have any performance or compatibility issues? Hey whats up guys in this video ,you get the solution to fix adobe premiere pro gpu acceleration what the complete video to know more. Sorry to say that but the part with double vs single precision is totally nonsense.Double precision float is only important for scientific purposes like calculating fluid dynamics, modeling the weather and other simulations.Premiere Pro won't render images any more precise with FP64 than with FP32. We are starting to get ready for another round of these GPU acceleration articles with newer hardware, so if you can wait a few months, we should have actual Premiere Pro benchmark results for Haswell . What this basically means is that the video card is not the limiting factor for Photoshop once you get above the GTX 650. Also, check out Creative COW's Premiere Pro podcast. In fact, the official list does not include any of the current generation NVIDIA 600-series cards at the moment, yet if you look in the actual configuration file the GeForce GTX 680 and GeForce GT 650M are both listed. I will be doing heavy photo editing, and some video editing (possibly a good amount I'm not sure yet). For the purpose of showing the performance difference between our test cards, however, we found that it does a terrific job. Any truth to this? If it isn't there, you can add it manually which should allow it to work. I discovered a cool workaround that can speed up Adobe Premiere running on a Mac. I used only one light curves as effect. With a touchpad or mouse you have an extra step in your movements when you go between typing and moving the cursor. NOTE: If you have CS6 or a different version, you will need to modify the file path accordingly. In addition, at 4K you may run into a problem with having enough RAM since the 6700K only supports 64GB max. I can guarantee you'll get better support from us and our sales reps can really help you tailor the entire laptop to exactly match your needs. Work with Motion Graphics templates in After Effects; Use expressions to create drop-down lists in Motion Graphics templates; Work with Master Properties to create Motion Graphics templates; Views and previews. Our Wide Gamut screens in particular might interest you since you are doing heavy photo editing. In this article, we want to explore the performance differences between a wide range of different video cards. Adobe and AMD ran a series of tests to see just how much difference GPU acceleration made in the new Mac Pro. But I will be sure to recommend your company to my friends your customer service is clearly excellent. With a pointing stick your fingers are always in the position to type and you seamlessly move between typing and cursor movement. After Effects is also GPU-optimized. This essentially doubles the number of video card that can be used and is reflected in the Adobe's list of supported cards . Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 takes full advantage of your graphics card. Can someone link me a guide on how to configure MPE GPU acceleration to work with 660? The example from Adobe in the post. This is where it gets nitpicky. thank you very much in advance! Does Workstation 11 provide any GPU acceleration in VMs? Since you cannot use MPE with your current card, you unfortunately can't just use a program like GPU-Z to see how much video RAM you are currently using. If you are fine not being completely covered, however, a GeForce card is going to give you much more "bang for the buck". Thanks for your reply. It's hard to find solid benchmarks on this topic. I had one on a Toshiba back in high school, and it was way better for gaming than a trackpad. Here are some speed differences from cpu only to cpu and iGPU. Hi there, I have a graphics card question. One caveat I will say is that I believe AMD moved to a fully automated assembly line with the 300-series cards, so reliability should be better with that series. I am a Premiere Pro CS6 user as well and the GPU acceleration does make a difference. Make sure that Premier Pro has been updated to the latest version since that file changes as Adobe adds more cards to their supported list. Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 takes full advantage of your graphics card. The new Adobe Mercury Graphics Engine(2) within Photoshop CS6 utilizes both OpenCL and OpenGL(TM), to accelerate new and existing features such as the new Blur Gallery that runs up to 10x as fast(1) on the upcoming "Trinity" APU with OpenCL GPU acceleration turned on. I really appreciate it! Now that you are looking at C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Premiere CS5 in command prompt, type GPUSniffer.exe and press ENTER. No AMD video cards work with the GPU acceleration in CS5 / CS6, unfortunately. However, while there is extensive graphics card support from Premiere on PCs, it is very limited on the Mac. I discovered a cool workaround that can speed up Adobe Premiere running on a Mac. To actually measure how long each effect took to apply, we simply enabled the integrated "Timing" feature in Photoshop CS6 which displays how long Photoshop took to perform an action. I've heard the R9 line is compelling, like the 290x or 390x. The one thing I did notice is that the Lenovo W530 is a generation behind on the chipset and CPU. Adobe has a list of video cards that are compatible with the Mercury Playback Engine (MPE), but - as is often the case with compatibility lists - it is at times slightly outdated as new products are continuously being released. in that article you show text file that have this card in the list, but when i check same text file on my system it's did't written there. So you don't have to mess with any text files, but Adobe is still making it clear when you are using a card that is not officially supported. In order to do so, we will be using the not-yet finalized Premiere Pro Benchmark (PPBM6) for Adobe Premiere CS6. This decision has been making me crazy. What video card did you have before? Add your card to the list and hopefully it works. I posted the link to this article on Photoshop Forums. I don't believe programs like this benefit at all from multiple video cards. And around 20% GPU usage is typical, but may go as high as 50% if you are resizing your video resolution from, say, 4k down to 1080p, during export. At the same time, the 970 has Maxwell architecture which is more efficient (145W TDP vs 250 on the gtx 780! To help bring GPU acceleration to a whole range of Adobe programs such as Photoshop CS6. His card, as seen in the link above, is already listed as supported. Specifically, Adobe has only announced support for the graphics cards in MacBook Pros. I've never given that any thought, but I completely understand how long term use of a trackpad or mouse could cause issues. The Quadro 4000 does very well, matching the speed of even the fastest GeForce GTX cards we tested. We fully expect this to result in a serious performance hit, but it will work well as a baseline to compare the other cards against. I'm currently working on a Dell Precision T3500 (Couple years old, I know) and I have downloaded Adobe CC. Buuut, I cannot work without a pointing stick because I'm so used to it and cannot use a touchpad or even a mouse anymore without stress. Plus, you are the perfect example of how it often also earns us word of mouth recommendations! hi. TN. ), faster clock, more VRAM, is faster for some tasks, and adds partial H.265 support for decoding (at least might help in monitoring); all this makes it not exactly apples to apples. If you are doing light video editing (couple of clips, only a few effects and transitions) then the K2000M probably won't be any faster than the K1000M. Since some of the cards that we are testing are not natively supported by the Mercury Playback Engine, we will be editing the configuration file to allow us to enable MPE GPU acceleration. The Quadro 2000 has a bit of a performance drop, but considering that it is half the price of the Quadro 4000 does fairly well. Â. This method was based off of HardwareHeaven.com's popular Photoshop Benchmark V3 benchmark, but adapted to specifically target GPU accelerated effects. This may sound a bit redundant, as the device name is pretty obvious if you know what you installed, but Adobe is very specific about the name that’s used, including capitalization. Adobe Premiere Pro CC is the industry's leading video solution, leveraging NVIDIA GPUs to accelerate performance for real-time editing on your most challenging workflows and even with 8K video. I never had this issue with CS6. (Optional) Multiple GPUs, including … Love it, thanks guys! With Premiere Pro CS6 version 6.0.2 and Premiere Pro CC, Adobe introduced GPU acceleration via OpenCL in addition to CUDA which allows AMD cards to be used. In the folder "Program Files " "Adobe" "Premiere CS6" open the text file called cuda_supported_cards.txt. The exact amount of vRAM needed is very difficult to determine ahead of time, but one formula from Adobe is available for amount of vRAM needed for still frames. Once you have that sorted out, you can make use of our benchmark results to determine which video card is right for you to use with Adobe Premiere Pro CS6. Furthermore, I read somewhere that in the new version of Premiere Pro you can use your gpu (if it has the minimum requirements) simply skipping the warning advise. Here are my PC specs: Windows 10 Home (64b) Intel i7 @3.70 GHZ, 6 cores Gigabyte Technology Mobo RAM: 32GB DDR4 GPU: GTX 1070 Several TB of HD space + SSD It works if I use software Mercury engine. In order to show the importance of OpenCL support, we included the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 in our list of video cards since it does not support OpenCL. It helps.  Technically you will only get PCI-E 2.0 levels of bandwidth between the card and motherboard, but that is not generally a performance limitation for these types of applications... so I wouldn't worry about it! First off, you want to make sure you have at least 8GB of RAM (I’d recommend even 16GB as a minimum) and a fast graphics processing unit (GPU). From a native support standpoint, the GTX 680 is a great choice simply because you do not need to manually edit any configuration files in order for MPE GPU acceleration to function. HP Z820 workstation with two Intel quad 2050 processors, Nvidia K2000 with K20 gpu, 20 gb ram, 3 hd drives, 1 for software, 1 for actual file, 1 solid state for Photoshop scratch, if you want to go off the deap end add up 512gb ram, upgrade to two Nviidia K20x gpu's and get another solid state drive for working files. Most of the time, double precision computing is not really needed since there is nothing in the code that needs results that precise. So based on that, X79 should still be better than Haswell, but only by something like 15-20%. Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. Hi williamAm not trying to showoff here just need advice,, Am building a pc and i wanted to do most things very very well BUT not perfect at any one perticular thing, mainly games and photos and video editing, the pc based on the intel I7 3960x and 32gb of ram expandable to 64gb if needed and two hd7970 in crossfire, 6TB of storage in raid 10 512gb ssd for OS, Now i know 512gb for OS is way too much BUT am planing on using the same ssd as scratch disk as well, And here i my question, is ok to use there same ssd for OS and scratch disk or would i be better of with a dedicated ssd for scratch disk?Speed in the main foucs in this bulid. I didn't undestand very well .. Can someone explain me, for example, why Gtx 760 is in the supported list of gpu acceleration and ray-tracing in after effects cc, but NOT in the supported list of Premiere pro cc??! Strangely, it did worse than the AMD Radeon HD 7750 and Radeon HD 7870 even though it is technically a much more powerful card. Your data seems to suggest that lower cards like the GTX 660 are actually superior or at least on par. only. Overall, I probably wouldn't worry about upgrading if you already have a GTX 780 or 780 Ti, but if you are looking for a new card I would go with the GTX 970 - especially since it is often half the cost of a GTX 780Ti.